An investigation of very short term olfactory recognition memory was m
ade with odors of low familiarity to subjects. The experimental proced
ure was that currently used to make qualitative similarity judgments o
n odors delivered in paired succession. Subjects made similarity judgm
ents in a yes/no recognition paradigm on odors that were either identi
cal or different. The dependence of recognition performance upon the d
egree of qualitative similarity was assessed by using two sets of diss
imilar odor pairs: slightly dissimilar pairs (S1) and very dissimilar
pairs (S2). Performance in terms of correct judgments (hits, correct r
ejections) was rather good for identical pairs in both sets and was ne
arly perfect for very dissimilar pairs with a delay of 2-300 sec, sugg
esting no effect of time or similarity on performance. However, for sl
ightly dissimilar pairs, false alarms increased in number, thereby ind
icating a dependence of the recognition score on the qualitative dista
nce between odors. In addition, false alarms tended to increase with t
he lengthening of the retention interval. It was suggested that the su
bjects based their responses on their capability to detect differences
between odors rather than recognizing their similarities. Correct ide
ntifications were thus preserved at the cost of increasing false alarm
s when the discrimination task was made more difficult by closer simil
arity between odors (S1) or by the fading of memory traces with time.
Studying the congruence between the similarity judgments and the kind
of evocations associated with paired odors gives some support to the v
iew that recognition performances had some cognitive/semantic basis.