T. Zavanella et al., EVALUATION OF THE TUMOR-PROMOTING ACTIVITY OF 2 BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR BLOCKING-AGENTS, PROPRANOLOL AND ATENOLOL, IN LIVER OF FISCHER-344 RATS, Carcinogenesis, 15(11), 1994, pp. 2531-2539
The tumor-promoting activity of two beta-adrenoreceptor blocking agent
s, propranolol and atenolol, was tested in a two-stage protocol of hep
atocarcinogenesis in male and female Fischer 344 rats. Propranolol is
a lipophilic nonselective beta-blocker mainly eliminated via the liver
; atenolol is a hydrophilic beta(1)-selective blocking agent, mainly e
liminated via the kidney. Animals were initiated with a single dose of
diethylnitrosamine (DEN, 200 mg/kg, i.p.) and, after 17 days of recov
ery, were continuously treated with propranolol (75-100 mg/kg) or aten
olol (300 mg/kg) by gavage for up to 21 months. Rats given phenobarbit
al (0.05% in the diet) were used as positive controls. After 2, 4 and
8 months of promotion, preneoplastic lesions were quantified by staini
ng sections of liver for gamma-glutamyltrans-peptidase (GGT). In non-i
nitiated rats, neither propranolol nor atenolol influenced the develop
ment of spontaneous preneoplastic or neoplastic liver lesions. The res
ults obtained in DEN-initiated rats given propranolol cannot be unequi
vocally interpreted. In the male, propranolol seemed to be ineffective
, In the female, there was weak enhancement of DEN-induced GGT foci at
4 and 8 months and of neoplastic lesions thereafter. However, there w
as great interindividual variability in focus and tumor yields. Unfort
unately, due to the high incidence of liver tumors in rats given DEN a
lone and the small number of propranolol-treated rats that survived un
til the end of the experiment, no definite conclusion can be drawn abo
ut the modifying potential of this beta-blocker on liver carcinogenesi
s. There was no evidence of liver tumor promotion in DEN-initiated rat
s of either sex given atenolol.