Sj. Wiegrefe et al., PHYLOGENY OF ELMS (ULMUS, ULMACEAE) - MOLECULAR EVIDENCE FOR A SECTIONAL CLASSIFICATION, Systematic botany, 19(4), 1994, pp. 590-612
The approximately 45 woody species of Ulmus (Ulmaceae) have been place
d in five to nine sections on the basis of morphological characters. C
ladistic analyses of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation were e
mployed to examine phylogenetic relationships among 29 Ulmus accession
s, including representatives from all proposed sections and subsection
s, and Zelkova serrata. Sufficient variation was detected to construct
cladograms with branches both well-resolved and supported. The cpDNA
results are largely congruent with those based on nuclear ribosomal DN
A. Inclusion of 18 morphological/chemical characters further resolved
relationships within the genus. Intrageneric relationships implied by
the molecular and combined cladograms differ from previous classificat
ions in a number of respects. Three species, U. crassifolia, U. seroti
na, and U. thomasii, which have been placed in two or three sections,
were found to form a well differentiated monophyletic group (sect. Tri
choptelea). The maintenance of sections Anisoptelea and Trichocarpus a
nd the recognition of subsections Foliaceae and Glabrae within section
Ulmus are not supported. The inclusion of U. mexicana, sometimes trea
ted as the distinct genus Chaetoptelea, within Ulmus is supported. The
molecular evidence supports the distinctiveness of U. rubra and the r
ecognition of two subgenera: Oreoptelea (sects. Blepharocarpus, Chaeto
ptelea, and Trichoptelea s. l.) and Ulmus (sects. Lanceifolia, Micropt
elea, and Ulmus).