James (Oceania 1991) criticizes some of my interpretive proposals on t
he political ideology of ancient Tonga, claiming that my emphasis on p
redominantly male relationships in the titular system reduces 'Polynes
ian truths' to 'Freudian dogma'. James sees Tonga as a 'markedly bilat
eral' rather than 'patrilineal' society, manifesting symptoms of Malin
owski's 'matrilineal complex', particularly an incestuous fixation on
the sister rather than the mother, correlated with the importance of t
he brother/sister relationship in social structure, and the alleged tr
ansmission of rank through females only. James attempts to find eviden
ce for her claims in the origin myth of the titular system. I show tha
t - contrary to her interpretation - no brother/sister incest can be f
ound in this myth, where, moreover, the female presence is subdued and
desexualized. My rejoinder raises issues of general anthropological i
nterest in the realms of symbolism, gender, the analysis of political
myth, and of the interrelationship of psychological and cultural proce
sses.