The common source of anthropogenic radioactivity of the polar regions
has been global fallout from nuclear weapons testing in the atmosphere
. The depositions from this source are at a minimum in the polar regio
ns. Nevertheless polar ecosystems may contain relatively high levels o
f radioactive contamination. This is true, in particular, for the Arct
ic regions, which beside global fallout have received significant amou
nts of radioactivity from a number of other sources. Some of the sourc
es viz discharges from nuclear reprocessing in Western Europe and the
Chernobyl accident are well described. Others, such as local fallout f
rom the Novaya Zemlya test cite, discharges from nuclear facilities to
the Siberian rivers Ob, Yenisey and Lena and dumping of nuclear waste
in the Barents and Kara Seas are less well documented, but may contri
bute significantly to the observed and future contamination of the Arc
tic. Although the radioecological sensitivity of food products front A
rctic regions tend to be higher than we know it from temperate regions
, the very low productivity Of Nordic regions imply low collective dos
es front these regions. However, high individual doses from radioactiv
e contamination may be seen in the Arctic as it has been observed for,
e.g. reindeers breeders. Radiocaesium is concentrated from lower to h
igher trophic levels. The marine animals contain orders of magnitude l
ower Cs-137 levels than terrestrial animals in Arctic regions and the
transfer of Cs-137 is one to two orders of magnitude greater than that
of Sr-90 to meat of animals. The Antarctic continent is apparently ch
aracterized with extremely low levels of anthropogenic radioactive con
tamination. However data are sparse compared to the Arctic.