There has been considerable discussion regarding the conservativeness
of low-dose cancer risk estimates based upon linear extrapolation from
upper confidence limits. Various groups have expressed a need for bes
t (point) estimates of cancer risk in order to improve risk/benefit de
cisions. Point estimates of carcinogenic potency obtained from maximum
likelihood estimates of low-dose slope may be highly unstable, being
sensitive both to the choice of the dose-response model and possibly t
o minimal perturbations of the data. For carcinogens that augment back
ground carcinogenic processes and/or for mutagenic carcinogens, at low
doses the tumor incidence versus target tissue dose is expected to be
linear. Pharmacokinetic data may be needed to identify and adjust for
exposure-dose nonlinearities. Based on the assumption that the dose r
esponse is linear over low doses, a stable point estimate for low-dose
cancer risk is proposed. Since various models give similar estimates
of risk down to levels of 1%, a stable estimate of the low-dose cancer
slope is provided by s = 0.01/ED01, where ED01 is the dose correspond
ing to an excess cancer risk of 1%. Thus, low-dose estimates of cancer
risk are obtained by, risk = s X dose. The proposed procedure is simi
lar to one which has been utilized in the past by the Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration. The upper
confidence limit, s, corresponding to this point estimate of low-dose
slope is similar to the upper limit, q1, obtained from the generaliz
ed multistage model. The advantage of the proposed procedure is that s
provides stable estimates of low-dose carcinogenic potency, which are
not unduly influenced by small perturbations of the tumor incidence r
ates, unlike q1.