Sd. Barrett, BARRIERS TO CONTESTABILITY IN THE DEREGULATED EUROPEAN AVIATION MARKET, Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 26(2), 1992, pp. 159-165
The deregulation of aviation in the United States and intercity bus tr
ansport in the United Kingdom initially resulted in substantial fare r
eductions associated with new market entry. Many new market entrants s
ubsequently left the market and fares increased. International aviatio
n in Europe has been operated by national airlines with price collusio
n and capacity sharing and a ban on new entrants. The normal economy f
ares charged on air services within Europe are the highest in the worl
d. Therefore, there is significant scope for fare reductions when the
European Community (EC) internal market comes into operation in 1993.
Deregulation of market access will, however, leave unaddressed other b
arriers to contestability in the deregulated European aviation market.
The structural barriers to contestability include hub airport dominan
ce by the incumbent airlines, ground handling monopolies, and computer
reservation system (CRS) bias. The paper proposes measures to ensure
access to major airports for new entrant airlines on equal terms with
incumbent airlines and the deregulation of the market for airport grou
nd handling. The EC code of conduct for the neutral operation of CRS f
or incumbent and new entrant carriers is an important precedent. The s
trategic obstacles to contestability in a deregulated European airline
industry are anticompetitive mergers and predatory pricing. In recent
years national airlines have acquired several independent airlines in
important European markets. It is recommended that such takeovers be
prohibited because of their anticompetitive implications in the absenc
e of competition between national airlines. The large networks of nati
onal airlines allow them to pursue policies of geographical price disc
rimination with reduced fares on contested routes and higher fares on
uncontested routes. Price surveillance is recommended to explain fare
differences between contested and uncontested routes. It is recommende
d that the EC competition policy exemption for price consultations bet
ween airlines be ended. Without measures to tackle the structural and
strategic obstacles to competition in European aviation, its liberaliz
ation may have no impact on the present high-cost system.