BARRIERS TO CONTESTABILITY IN THE DEREGULATED EUROPEAN AVIATION MARKET

Authors
Citation
Sd. Barrett, BARRIERS TO CONTESTABILITY IN THE DEREGULATED EUROPEAN AVIATION MARKET, Transportation research. Part A, Policy and practice, 26(2), 1992, pp. 159-165
Citations number
24
ISSN journal
09658564
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1992
Pages
159 - 165
Database
ISI
SICI code
0965-8564(1992)26:2<159:BTCITD>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
The deregulation of aviation in the United States and intercity bus tr ansport in the United Kingdom initially resulted in substantial fare r eductions associated with new market entry. Many new market entrants s ubsequently left the market and fares increased. International aviatio n in Europe has been operated by national airlines with price collusio n and capacity sharing and a ban on new entrants. The normal economy f ares charged on air services within Europe are the highest in the worl d. Therefore, there is significant scope for fare reductions when the European Community (EC) internal market comes into operation in 1993. Deregulation of market access will, however, leave unaddressed other b arriers to contestability in the deregulated European aviation market. The structural barriers to contestability include hub airport dominan ce by the incumbent airlines, ground handling monopolies, and computer reservation system (CRS) bias. The paper proposes measures to ensure access to major airports for new entrant airlines on equal terms with incumbent airlines and the deregulation of the market for airport grou nd handling. The EC code of conduct for the neutral operation of CRS f or incumbent and new entrant carriers is an important precedent. The s trategic obstacles to contestability in a deregulated European airline industry are anticompetitive mergers and predatory pricing. In recent years national airlines have acquired several independent airlines in important European markets. It is recommended that such takeovers be prohibited because of their anticompetitive implications in the absenc e of competition between national airlines. The large networks of nati onal airlines allow them to pursue policies of geographical price disc rimination with reduced fares on contested routes and higher fares on uncontested routes. Price surveillance is recommended to explain fare differences between contested and uncontested routes. It is recommende d that the EC competition policy exemption for price consultations bet ween airlines be ended. Without measures to tackle the structural and strategic obstacles to competition in European aviation, its liberaliz ation may have no impact on the present high-cost system.