J. Kaern et al., COMPARISON BETWEEN FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND IMAGE CYTOMETRY IN PLOIDY DISTRIBUTION ASSESSMENTS IN GYNECOLOGIC CANCER, Cytometry, 13(3), 1992, pp. 314-321
The DNA content in 37 tumors from 34 women with gynecological cancer w
as measured by flow cytometry (FCM) and interactive image cytometry (I
CM). Agreement was obtained in 81% of cases as regards ploidy levels,
but seven tumors (19%) showed different ploidies. Of these, five were
classified as diploid by FCM but either aneuploid (three cases) or pol
yploid (two cases) by ICM. Two other tumors were aneuploid by ICM but
polyploid (one case) and unclassifiable (one case) by FCM. All tumors
classified as aneuploid by FCM were also aneuploid by ICM, and all tum
ors classified diploid by ICM were also diploid by FCM. Of six patient
s whose tumors were classified as euploid (five diploid and one polypl
oid) by FCM but classified as aneuploid by ICM, five relapsed, and thr
ee of these have died of disease. On the basis of these findings, it i
s concluded that ICM must be performed in cases classified as diploid
by FCM to ensure that small subpopulations of aneuploid tumor cells ar
e not overlooked.