The phenomenon of genomic imprinting has recently excited much interes
t among experimental biologists. The population genetic consequences o
f imprinting, however, have remained largely unexplored. Several popul
ation genetic models are presented and the following conclusions drawn
: (i) systems with genomic imprinting need not behave similarly to oth
erwise identical systems without imprinting; (ii) nevertheless, many o
f the models investigated can be shown to be formally equivalent to mo
dels without imprinting; (iii) consequently, imprinting often cannot b
e discovered by following allele frequency changes or examining equili
brium values; (iv) the formal equivalences fail to preserve some well
known properties. For example, for populations incorporating genomic i
mprinting, parameter values exist that cause these populations to beha
ve like populations without imprinting, but with heterozygote advantag
e, even though no such advantage is present in these imprinting popula
tions. We call this last phenomenon "pseudoheterosis." The imprinting
systems that fail to be formally equivalent to nonimprinting systems a
re those in which males and females are not equivalent, i.e., two-sex
viability systems and sex-chromosome inactivation.