This study evaluates the cash flow performance of hospitals that are a
t a greater risk of closure, specifically small hospitals. Sampling th
e majority of small acute-care hospitals in the United States, the stu
dy evaluates urban and rural small hospitals with positive cash flows
for four consecutive fiscal periods and compares them with urban and r
ural hospitals with consecutive negative cash flows. In both urban and
rural settings, positive cash flow small hospitals operate under a no
t-for-profit form of ownership and have lower operating costs, a faste
r collection of receivables. They also own newer, larger facilities, p
ossess a Medicare higher case mix index, and offer more services in ma
rkets with lower per capita income.