Ew. Gertz et al., ADVERSE REACTIONS OF LOW OSMOLALITY CONTRAST-MEDIA DURING CARDIAC ANGIOGRAPHY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER STUDY, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 19(5), 1992, pp. 899-906
A multicenter study was performed to determine the incidence of advers
e reactions to two contrast media with similar low osmolality during c
ardiac angiography. The study was of a randomized double-blind design
comparing ioxaglate (an ionic dimer) and iopamidol (a nonionic compoun
d) and included 500 patients; 250 patients received ioxaglate and 250
iopamidol. There were 58 adverse reactions attributed to the contrast
media in the ioxaglate group and 29 in the iopamidol group (p < 0.001)
. Chest pain occurred in 11 patients in the ioxaglate group compared w
ith 5 in the iopamidol group (p = 0.123). Nausea or vomiting was prese
nt in 20 and 2 patients, respectively (p < 0.0003). Allergic adverse r
eactions, such as bronchospasm, urticaria and itching, occurred in 15
of the ioxaglate group and only 1 of the patients receiving iopamidol
(p < 0.0007). Fifty-two patients in the ioxaglate group had a known al
lergic history (not to contrast medium) or asthma, whereas 77 receivin
g iopamidol had a similar history. Seven of the 52 ioxaglate-treated p
atients developed an allergic adverse reaction compared with none of t
he 77 in the iopamidol group (p = 0.001). Of 41 patients receiving iox
aglate who were premedicated with diphenhydramine, 4 had an allergic a
dverse event. In the iopamidol group 45 patients received similar prem
edication and none had an allergic adverse reaction (p < 0.03). Thus,
this multicenter study shows that adverse reactions occur more often w
ith ioxaglate than with iopamidol and that patients with an allergic h
istory have a greater risk with ioxaglate therapy compared with iopami
dol.