Pe. Schwartz et al., EARLY DETECTION OF OVARIAN-CANCER - BACKGROUND, RATIONALE, AND STRUCTURE OF THE YALE EARLY DETECTION PROGRAM, The Yale journal of biology & medicine, 64(6), 1991, pp. 557-571
Ovarian cancer has received national attention as a highly virulent di
sease. Its lack of early warning symptoms and the failure to develop h
ighly sensitive screening tests have led some physicians to recommend
prophylactic oophorectomies to women with relatives who have had ovari
an cancer. Others have recommended routine screening of otherwise norm
al women for CA 125, a circulating tumor marker, and ultrasound examin
ations. Each of these techniques is associated with substantial false-
positive rates that could lead to unnecessary surgery. A review of epi
demiologic data suggests that familial ovarian cancer kindreds are rar
e, but women with first-degree relatives who have had ovarian cancer h
ave a significant risk themselves for developing ovarian cancer. In ad
dition, women with a great number of ovulatory cycles are at an increa
sed risk for the disease. Circulating tumor markers are frequently ele
vated in women with advanced ovarian cancer, but their value in early
detection of ovarian cancer has yet to be established. Advances in end
ovaginal ultrasound and color Doppler flow technology have significant
ly improved our ability to assess pelvic organs. This article presents
the background, rationale, and structure of the Yale Early Detection
Program for ovarian cancer, whose goals are to identify the best techn
iques for diagnosing ovarian cancer in an early stage, to determine th
e frequency with which such tests should be employed, to assess false-
positive results, and to identify women who might benefit from prophyl
actic oophorectomies.