A recognition memory paradigm was used to study the effect of text dif
ficulty on memory for practical stimuli. In the first two studies, pas
sages drawn from driving regulations were compared with passages from
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) materials; in the third study, material
was selected from two psychology textbooks that were rated in differe
nt categories of difficulty. The authors expected that in each compari
son the more difficult text would require more cognitive processing an
d, as a result, would be stored in a more elaborate way than would mat
erial from the easier text. After reading passages drawn from both lev
els of difficulty, the subjects were given a test that included items
categorized as verbatim, paraphrases, and correct or incorrect inferen
ces. The results of the three studies showed a difference in recogniti
on of item types as a function of stimulus materials. Recognition rate
s for the easier passages provide more evidence of verbatim or surface
memory than do the rates for the IRS passage and the difficult psycho
logy text.