EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL, ETOMIDATE, MIDAZOLAM, AND FENTANYL ON MOTOR EVOKED-RESPONSES TO TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL OR MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN HUMANS

Citation
Cj. Kalkman et al., EFFECTS OF PROPOFOL, ETOMIDATE, MIDAZOLAM, AND FENTANYL ON MOTOR EVOKED-RESPONSES TO TRANSCRANIAL ELECTRICAL OR MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN HUMANS, Anesthesiology, 76(4), 1992, pp. 502-509
Citations number
38
Journal title
ISSN journal
00033022
Volume
76
Issue
4
Year of publication
1992
Pages
502 - 509
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-3022(1992)76:4<502:EOPEMA>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
The effects of propofol, etomidate, midazolam, and fentanyl on motor e voked responses to transcranial stimulation (tc-MERs) were studied in five healthy human volunteers. Each subject, in four separate sessions , received intravenous bolus doses of propofol 2 mg.kg-1, etomidate 0. 3 mg.kg-1, midazolam 0.05 mg.kg-1, and fentanyl 3-mu-g.kg-1. Electrica l tc-MERs (tc(e)-MERs) were elicited with anodal stimuli of 500-700 V. Magnetic tc-MERs (tc(mag)-MERs) were elicited using a Cadwell MES-10 magnetic stimulator at maximum output. Compound muscle action potentia ls were recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle. Duplicate tc(e)-ME Rs and tc(mag)-MERs were recorded before and up to 30 min after drug i njection. Reproducible baseline tc(e)-MERs (amplitude 4.7 +/- 0.43 (SE M) mV, latency 29.4 +/- 0.35 ms) and tc(mag)-MERs (amplitude 3.7 +/- 0 .43 mV, latency 31.1 +/- 0.39 ms) were obtained in all subjects. Prono unced depression of tc(e)-MER amplitude to 2% of baseline values (P < 0.01) was observed 2 min after injection of propofol. Thirty minutes a fter injection of propofol, amplitude depression to 44% of baseline (P < 0.05) was still present, despite an apparent lack of sedation. Mida zolam caused significant (P < 0.01) amplitude depression, e.g., tc(mag )-MER to 16% of baseline values 5 min after injection. Significant dep ression persisted throughout the 30-min study period. Fentanyl did not cause any statistically significant amplitude changes in this small p opulation. Etomidate caused significant but transient depression of tc -MER amplitude. However, there was considerable intersubject variabili ty. Latency did not change significantly after any drug. The magnitude of drug-induced MER changes was similar for magnetic and electrical s timulation, although in two instances, at the peak of drug-induced dep ression, tc(mag)-MERs were absent when tc(e)-MERs were recordable. Sin ce amplitude depression after etomidate was less pronounced and of sho rter duration, etomidate may be preferable to propofol as an induction agent when tc-MER monitoring is indicated. Similarly, fentanyl may be preferable to midazolam as an intravenous supplement.