URBAN THEORY, URBANISM, AND SUBURBAN RESIDENCE

Citation
Cr. Tittle et Mc. Stafford, URBAN THEORY, URBANISM, AND SUBURBAN RESIDENCE, Social forces, 70(3), 1992, pp. 725-744
Citations number
43
Journal title
ISSN journal
00377732
Volume
70
Issue
3
Year of publication
1992
Pages
725 - 744
Database
ISI
SICI code
0037-7732(1992)70:3<725:UTUASR>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Data from a 1972 three-state survey are used to compare city, suburban , town, and rural dwellers in terms of five urbanism characteristics: (1) anonymity, (2) tolerance, (3) community social bonds, (4) alienati on, and (5) deviant behavior. Suburbanites displayed less urbanism tha n city dwellers, but they did not differ much from other noncity peopl e in this regard. In fact, residents of the various types of settlemen t do not fall on a neat continuum of urbanism from country to town to suburb to city. The dominant pattern is simply a city-noncity differen tiation, although there are a few anomalies. These results suggest tha t urban theories have limited usefulness for understanding urbanism am ong suburbanites, but they also reveal so little evidence of suburban distinctiveness that it may not require a unique explanation beyond th at needed to account for simple urban-nonurban differences.