QUALITATIVE FORECAST EVALUATION - A COMPARISON OF 2 PERFORMANCE-MEASURES

Citation
Cs. Mcintosh et Jh. Dorfman, QUALITATIVE FORECAST EVALUATION - A COMPARISON OF 2 PERFORMANCE-MEASURES, American journal of agricultural economics, 74(1), 1992, pp. 209-214
Citations number
15
ISSN journal
00029092
Volume
74
Issue
1
Year of publication
1992
Pages
209 - 214
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9092(1992)74:1<209:QFE-AC>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Agricultural producers and marketers often have access to several sets of forecasts on the same series. Decision makers must be able to eval uate the relative accuracy of the forecasts. The ability to evaluate w hether a series will move up or down is important for series related t o futures, options, other asset prices, and situations where processes can be modified according to changing economic conditions. A measure of qualitative forecast accuracy from Naik and Leuthold is compared to a probability-based measure developed by Henriksson and Merton. The H enriksson-Merton measure is shown to provide additional, and more accu rate, information concerning a model's qualitative forecasting ability .