Ea. Graveley et Jh. Littlefield, A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF 3 STAFFING MODELS FOR THE DELIVERY OF LOW-RISK PRENATAL-CARE, American journal of public health, 82(2), 1992, pp. 180-184
Background. Health care costs are increasing at more than twice the ra
te of inflation, thus, public officials are seeking safe and economic
methods to deliver quality prenatal care to poor pregnant women. This
study was undertaken to determine the relationship between the cost an
d effectiveness of three prenatal clinic staffing models: physician ba
sed, mixed staffing, and clinical nurse specialist with physicians ava
ilable for consulation. Methods. Maternal and neonatal physiological o
utcome data were obtained from the hospital clinical records of 156 wo
men attending these clinics. The women were then interviewed concernin
g their satisfaction with their prenatal care clinic. The financial of
ficer from each clinic provided data on the clinic staffing costs and
hours of service. Results. There were no differences in outcomes for t
he maternal-neonatal physiological variables, although newborn admissi
on to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) approached significance
among the clinics. The clinic staffed by clinical nurse specialists ha
d the greatest client satisfaction and the lowest cost per visit. Conc
lusions. The use of clinical nurse specialists might substantially red
uce the cost of providing prenatal care while maintaining quality, and
might thereby save valuable resources.