Fcg. Southon et al., INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN COMPLEX HEALTH-SERVICES - ORGANIZATIONAL IMPEDIMENTS TO SUCCESSFUL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER AND DIFFUSION, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 4(2), 1997, pp. 112-124
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Information Science & Library Science","Computer Science Information Systems","Information Science & Library Science","Medical Informatics
Objective: To identify impediments to the successful transfer and impl
ementation of packaged information systems through large, divisionaliz
ed health services. Design: A case analysis of the failure of an imple
mentation of a critical application in the Public Health System of the
State of New South Wales, Australia, was carried out. This applicatio
n had been proven in the United States environment. Measurements: Inte
rviews involving over 60 staff at all levels of the service were under
taken by a team of three. The interviews were recorded and analyzed fo
r key themes, and the results were shared and compared to enable a con
tinuing critical assessment. Results: Two components of the transfer o
f the system were considered: the transfer from a different environmen
t, and the diffusion throughout a large, divisionalized organization.
The analyses were based on the Scott-Morton organizational fit framewo
rk. In relation to the first, it was found that there was a lack of fi
t in the business environments and strategies, organizational structur
es and strategy-structure pairing as well as the management process-ro
les pairing. The diffusion process experienced problems because of the
lack of fit in the strategy-structure, strategy-structure-management
processes, and strategy-structure-role relationships. Conclusion: The
large-scale developments of integrated health services present great c
hallenges to the efficient and reliable implementation of information
technology, especially in large, divisionalized organizations. There i
s a need to take a more sophisticated approach to understanding the co
mplexities of organizational factors than has traditionally been the c
ase.