This paper uncovers an implicit assumption, and its implications, made
in the process of maximizing yield (or minimizing costs) subject to t
he duration constraints. Using linear programming results, it is shown
that this technique is sensible only if the yield of a bond is a line
ar function of its duration measures. Utilizing this result the paper
analyzes the relative importance of the duration constraints. Former s
tudies have hinted that the first order duration may be the most impor
tant. It is shown here there is no reason to satisfy the first duratio
n constraint with priority over satisfaction of a higher order duratio
n constraint. practitioners who use duration techniques for portfolio
immunization must be aware of such an important counter-intuitive resu
lt.