Tx. Fan et al., VISUAL-RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF UNITS IN THE TURTLE CEREBELLAR GRANULARLAYER INVITRO, Journal of neurophysiology, 69(4), 1993, pp. 1314-1322
1. Single units were recorded extracellularly in the turtle's cerebell
ar cortex from an isolated brain preparation during visual stimulation
. Only a small fraction of the isolated units responded to visual stim
uli. For these visually responsive units, the most effective visual st
imulus was a moving check pattern that covered the entire surface of t
he retinal eyecup. The visually responsive units had little or no spon
taneous spike activity, nor were they driven by flashes of diffuse lig
ht or stationary patterns. 2. All the visually responsive units were d
irection sensitive and were driven exclusively by the contralateral ey
e. This direction tuning was well fit by a limacon model (mean correla
tion coefficient, 0. 89). The distribution of the entire sample indica
tes a slight preponderance of upward preferred directions. 3. The dire
ction tuning of these cerebellar units was independent of stimulus con
trast or the pattern's configuration (such as checkerboards or random
check or dot patterns). In the preferred direction, a unit's spike fre
quency increased monotonically as a function of stimulus velocity unti
l approximately 10-degrees/s, but remained direction sensitive (relati
ve to the opposite direction) at speeds as fast as 100-degrees/s. 4. I
n some experiments the ventrocaudal brain stem was transected in the f
rontal plane just caudal to the cerebellar peduncles. Although this le
sion presumably removes climbing fiber input from the inferior olivary
nuclei, the visual-response properties in the cerebellar cortex were
unaffected. 5. The response properties of these units indicate that th
ey encode retinal slip information in the cerebellum. Unlike studies i
n rabbit for which visual responses in cerebellum are binocular and ap
pear to encode visual field rotation along the three canal planes, the
se units in turtle are monocular and encode many directions of motion.
The possible role of these units in oculomotor control are discussed.