A. Tripiciano et al., DUAL CONTROL OF SEMINIFEROUS TUBULE CONTRACTILITY MEDIATED BY ET(A) AND ET(B) ENDOTHELIN RECEPTOR SUBTYPES, The FASEB journal, 11(4), 1997, pp. 276-286
Testicular myoid cells surrounding the seminiferous tubule are contrac
tile cells responsible for peritubular contractility and for the propu
lsion of tubular fluid and spermatozoa. We have investigated the contr
actile response of rat myoid cells to endothelins (ETs) in cell and or
gan culture and analyzed the cell signaling involved. ET-2, ET-3, and
IRL 1620, a highly selective agonist of ET(B) receptor, elicit [Ca2+](
i) increases, though with dissimilar potencies and kinetics. Competiti
on binding assays using [I-125]ET-1, [I-125]ET-3 and [I-125]IRL 1620 s
how that myoid cells express both ET(A) and ET(B) receptors with high
affinity for ET-1 and ET-1/ET-3, respectively. All endothelin isoforms
activate phosphoinositide (PI) turnover, but only stimulation of the
ET(A) receptor mediates both PI turnover and mobilization of [Ca2+](i)
. Although stimulation of the ET(B) receptor with IRL 1620 fails to pr
oduce a significant effect on inositol phosphate (IF) production, it i
nduces mobilization of a thapsigargin-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ poo
l in the absence of any measurable IP production. We also studied the
effect of U-73122 [1-(6-[17-beta-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5 (10)-trien-17-yl
] amino/hexyl)-H-1-pirrole-2,5-dione] and its inactive analog, U-73343
, on Ca2+ mobilization and IP production after selective stimulation o
f ET receptors. U-73122 (1 mu M) completely inhibited the effect of ET
(A)-mediated ET-1 stimulation of IP production, whereas U-73343 was in
active. However, in the presence of U-73122, the selective stimulation
of ET(B) receptors induced the mobilization of a thapsigargin-sensiti
ve and inositol phosphate-independent intracellular Ca2+ pool. The ET(
B) receptor-dependent mobilization of [Ca2+](i) resulted mainly from C
a2+ release from intracellular Ca2+ stores. This paper illustrates con
traction of myoid cells in the seminiferous tubule in response to sele
ctive activation of either ET receptor. Scanning electron microscopy o
f the peritubular tissue demonstrates that the contractile response to
ET was inhibited by a combination of BQ-123 and BQ-788, but not by ei
ther antagonist alone. Moreover, the observation that selective stimul
ation of ET(B) receptor with IRL 1620 also resulted in cell contractio
n strongly suggests that stimulation of either ET(A) or ET(B) receptor
s alone may be sufficient to elicit seminiferous tubule contractility,
Two types of receptors account for the actions of endothelin on contr
actile activity of seminiferous tubule: 1) an ET(A) receptor that is p
ositively coupled to phospholipase C (PLC) and Ca2+ mobilization; and
2) an ET(B) receptor that induces title mobilization of a thapsigargin
-sensitive intracellular Ca2+ pool in a manner independent of the form
ation of inositol phosphates. ET may play a complex role in regulating
the flux of spermatozoa along the seminiferous tubule through its con
tractile effect on peritubular myoid cells.-Tripiciano, A., Palombi, F
., Ziparo, E., Filippini, A. Dual control of seminiferous tubule contr
actility mediated by ET(A) and ET(B) endothelin receptor subtypes.