DNA RELATEDNESS BETWEEN XENORHABDUS SPP (ENTEROBACTERIACEAE), SYMBIOTIC BACTERIA OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES, AND A PROPOSAL TO TRANSFER XENORHABDUS-LUMINESCENS TO A NEW GENUS, PHOTORHABDUS GEN-NOV
Ne. Boemare et al., DNA RELATEDNESS BETWEEN XENORHABDUS SPP (ENTEROBACTERIACEAE), SYMBIOTIC BACTERIA OF ENTOMOPATHOGENIC NEMATODES, AND A PROPOSAL TO TRANSFER XENORHABDUS-LUMINESCENS TO A NEW GENUS, PHOTORHABDUS GEN-NOV, International journal of systematic bacteriology, 43(2), 1993, pp. 249-255
The levels of DNA relatedness for a broad sample of Xenorhabdus strain
s isolated from different species of entomopathogenic nematodes (Stein
ernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) and from different geographical sou
rces were estimated by the hydroxyapatite method. The level of DNA-DNA
relatedness for the two phases of each isolate tested was not signifi
cantly different from 100%, demonstrating unequivocally that the phase
variation demonstrated by all Xenorhabdus spp. is not due to contamin
ation. The isolates of the described Xenorhabdus species coalesced int
o different DNA relatedness groups, confirming that Xenorhabdus nemato
philus, Xenorhabdus bovienii, Xenorhabdus poinarii, and Xenorhabdus be
ddingii, defined on the basis of phenotypic differences, are valid spe
cies. The symbiont of Steinemema intermedia also coalesced with the X.
bovienii isolates. This was the only symbiont of seven recently descr
ibed and unamed Steinernema spp. (including Steinernema ritteri, Stein
emema rara, and Steinernema anomali) that formed a group with any of t
he previously described Xenorhabdus species; new species descriptions
are required to accommodate the other taxa, but too few isolates were
available to allow satisfactory descriptions of them. The DNA relatedn
ess data also showed that the bacteria currently classified as Xenorha
bdus luminescens are significantly different from all other Xenorhabdu
s strains. These data strongly support indications from previous studi
es of phenotypic characteristics, cellular fatty acids, and DNA relate
dness that X. luminescens should be classified as a separate genus. A
new genus, Photorhabdus, with an amended description of the type speci
es, Photorhabdus luminescens, is proposed.