Phf. Nicholson et al., ASSESSMENT OF THE STRENGTH OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR IN-VITRO - RELATIONSHIP WITH ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENTS OF THE CALCANEUS, Bone, 20(3), 1997, pp. 219-224
Matched pairs of the right proximal femur and right calcaneus were obt
ained from 64 cadavers (28 female, 36 male), Ultrasonic velocity and b
roadband ultrasonic attenuation were measured in the calcaneus using a
laboratory ultrasound system, Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured
at the calcaneus and at the trochanteric and neck regions of the femu
r using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Femoral strength was determi
ned in a mechanical test simulating a fall onto the greater trochanter
. Femoral BMD was more strongly correlated with femoral strength (r(2)
= 0.71, 0.88 for neck BMD and trochanteric BMD, respectively) than we
re any of the other predictive variables investigated (p < 0.05), Calc
aneal ultrasonic measurements alone produced correlations with femoral
strength of r(2) = 0.40-0.47, with no significant differences observe
d in predictive ability between the various ultrasonic parameters, In
multiple regression analysis, ultrasound was, in general, not a signif
icant additional independent predictor of femoral strength when combin
ed with either femoral or calcaneal BMD, and combining ultrasonic para
meters did not improve the ability to predict femoral strength, Calcan
eal width was found to be significantly correlated with both femoral s
trength and femoral BMD, and this explained the slightly better correl
ations with femoral strength found for those ultrasonic parameters whi
ch were not effectively normalized for calcaneal width, In summary, ca
lcaneal ultrasound did not significantly enhance the prediction of fem
oral strength compared to femoral BMD measurements alone, Given the su
bstantial differences between the in vitro and in vivo situations, thi
s finding does not necessarily contradict emerging clinical data indic
ating that ultrasound and BMD have comparable and independent predicti
ve ability for hip fracture risk, Reasons for the apparent discrepancy
are discussed, including the enhanced accuracy of DXA in vitro, Never
theless, it is suggested that further fundamental investigations into
the efficacy of current ultrasonic techniques are warranted. (C) 1997
by Elsevier Science Inc.