HYPERTENSION IN DIABETES STUDY (HDS) .1. PREVALENCE OF HYPERTENSION IN NEWLY PRESENTING TYPE-2 DIABETIC-PATIENTS AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH RISK-FACTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR AND DIABETIC COMPLICATIONS
Rc. Turner et al., HYPERTENSION IN DIABETES STUDY (HDS) .1. PREVALENCE OF HYPERTENSION IN NEWLY PRESENTING TYPE-2 DIABETIC-PATIENTS AND THE ASSOCIATION WITH RISK-FACTORS FOR CARDIOVASCULAR AND DIABETIC COMPLICATIONS, Journal of hypertension, 11(3), 1993, pp. 309-317
Objective: To determine the prevalence of hypertension in newly diagno
sed type 2 diabetic patients and its association with risk factors for
cardiovascular and diabetic complications. Design: Cross-sectional st
udy. Patients: Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients (n = 3648, mea
n age 52 years, 59% male) recruited for the UK Prospective Diabetes St
udy (UKPDS). Measurements: Blood pressure, body mass index, waist:hip
ratio, ECG signs of ischaemia and of left ventricular hypertrophy (Min
nesota code), fasting plasma glucose, urate, creatinine, insulin, trig
lycerides, high-density lipoprotein-, low-density lipoprotein- and tot
al cholesterol, urinary albumin: creatinine ratio, retinopathy grading
. Results: Thirty-nine per cent of the patients (35% of the males, 46%
of the females) were hypertensive (mean blood pressure greater-than-o
r-equal-to 160 systolic and/or greater-than-or-equal-to 90 mmHg diasto
lic 2 and 9 months after diagnosis of diabetes, or taking antihyperten
sive therapy). The hypertensive patients had a greater mean body mass
index (30.1 versus 28.0 kg/m2, P < 0.0001) than the normotensive patie
nts. They also had higher fasting plasma triglyceride (1.94 versus 1.6
9 mmol/l, P < 0.0001) and insulin (15.0 versus 12.8 mU/l, P < 0.0001)
levels but these associations disappeared or weakened when obesity was
taken into account. Hypertensive compared with normotensive subjects
suffered a higher prevalence of cardiovascular events before the diagn
osis of diabetes (4.8 versus 2.5%, P < 0.0001), of microalbuminuria (a
lbumin: creatinine ratio > 5.0 g/mol; 24 versus 14%, P < 0.0001), of E
CG signs of probable and possible ischaemia (24 versus 14%, P < 0.0001
) and of left ventricular hypertrophy (8.5 versus 3.8%; P < 0.0001). T
he prevalence of retinopathy was similar in the two groups. Conclusion
s: Hypertension is common in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes and is as
sociated with obesity. The association between hypertension and higher
triglyceride and insulin levels may be secondary to obesity in this p
opulation. An association between hypertension and cardiovascular comp
lications is already apparent at diagnosis of diabetes.