This comparative study employs the concept of physical rigour to map a
nd measure recreational routes and zones available to the public. The
comparison is made for 15 representative countryside districts in four
national settings (Great Britain, West Germany, France, and Benelux).
Three of the districts are national parks, while the others are 40 x
25 km settled areas chosen to typify the physical and human landscape
of their region. Statistical measures of access availability are compu
ted for five levels of access rigour, grading from passive through to
arduous. Road or 'passive' access is most prevalent in settled distric
ts of West Germany and France, while footpaths providing casual access
are most plentiful in West Germany and Benelux. Off-route lands open
to the public are most common in sparsely settled upland areas. Polyno
mial regressions show that both amplitude of relief and type of land c
over influence the availability of access types. However, land-use int
ensity is the strongest determinant of the access regime in all except
mountainous areas. Although not investigated statistically, regional
and national variations in access availability may be related to the h
istory of land apportionment and to legal/customary constraints on pub
lic access. These help to explain exceptionally low degrees of access
in Great Britain.