T. Hachenberg et al., CARDIOPULMONARY EFFECTS OF CONTINUOUS POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION AND INVERSED RATIO VENTILATION IN EXPERIMENTAL MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA, Anasthesist, 42(4), 1993, pp. 210-220
Continuous positive pressure ventilation (CPPV) is an established ther
apy for treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, cardiac
performance may be severely disturbed due to elevated intrathoracic p
ressure, inducing a decrease in cardiac output (CO) and oxygen deliver
y (D(O2)). Alternatively, mechanical ventilation with prolonged inspir
atory to expiratory duration ratio (inversed ratio ventilation IRV) ha
s been successfully used in ARF. No data are available about IRV in ac
ute haemodynamic oedema. Thus, the cardiopulmonary effects of CPPV (po
sitive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] = 10 cm H2O) and IRV (inspiratio
n to expiration duration ratio [I:E] = 3.0) were studied in nine dogs
(body weight 29.9+/-4.3 kg) before and after induction of myocardial i
schaemia. Methods. Continuous intravenous anaesthesia and muscle paral
ysis were provided by 1.2 mg.kg-1.h-1 piritramid and 0.08 mg.kg-1.h-1
pancuronium, and the animals were ventilated with intermittent positiv
e pressure ventilation (IPPV) as reference method. Cardiocirculatory p
erformance was determined by means of heart rate (HR), mean arterial p
ressure (MAP), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), central venous
presure (CVP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP) and left ve
ntricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Cardiac output (CO) was dete
rmined by thermodilution method. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) wa
s calculated. Pulmonary function was assessed by arterial and mixed ve
nous blood gas tension for oxygen (P(aO2), P(vO2) and carbon dioxide (
P(aCO2)). Functional residual lung capacity (FRC) was measured by mean
s of the foreign gas wash-in method using helium as inert gas, and det
ermination of extravascular lung water (EVLW) using the thermal-dye in
dicator technique. CPPV and IRV were studied in random sequence in the
controlphase and 60 min after induction of acute left ventricular isc
haemia, which was achieved by occlusion of the ramus interventriculari
s anterior. Results. During the control phase CPPV induced an increase
in MPAP (P<0.05), CVP (P<0.05) and PAOP (P<0.05). HR and MAP remained
unchanged, whereas CO decreased by 16% (P<0.05). FRC was elevated by
25 ml . kg-1 (P<0.01), but not EVLW (9.1+/-3.5 ml.kg-1). There was no
improvement in oxygenation; instead, oxygen delivery (D(O2) decreased
(P<0.05). During inversed ratio ventilation MPAP, CVP, PAOP increased,
but less than during CPPV. FRC was elevated mu 7.0 ml.kg-1 (P<0.05),
which was significantly less than during CPPV (P<0.05). EVLW revealed
no differences. During IPPV in the ischaemia phase cardiopulmonary per
formance deteriorated significantly. CO decreased by 19% (P<0.05), whe
reas HR, MPAP, CVP and PAOP increased (P<0.05). P(aO2) was lower (P<0.
05) and alveoloarterial P(O2) gradient (P(AaO2) increased (P<0.05). Al
l animals revealed moderate pulmonary oedema (EVLW = 15.1+/-8.4 ml.kg-
1) (P<0.01) and a lower FRC. Mechanical ventilation with PEEP signific
antly improved oxygenation and FRC; however, D(O2) was slightly lower
than during IPPV (not significant). IRV elevated P(aO2), FRC and D(O2)
, since CO was not depressed when compared with IPPV. Conclusions. CPP
V and IRV may induce a recruitment of collapsed or hypoventilated lung
areas, which is more pronounced during CPPV. During both modes of ven
tilation, oxygenation was improved without apparent changes in EVLW Ha
emodynamic performance was more impaired during CPPV, and no improveme
nt of left ventricular function secondary to an elevated intrathoracic
pressure was observed. Occlusion of the RIVA coronary artery typicall
y induces an infarction of 35% of left ventricular muscle mass; howeve
r, non-ischaemic myocardium reveals an unchanged or increased contract
ility. Thus, a reduction of left ventricular preload secondary to CPPV
mainly contributes to haemodynamic depression, which is less pronounc
ed during IRV due to a lower peak inspiratory airway pressure and mean
airway pressure. IRV may be useful for mechanical ventilation during
left ventricular failure with pulmonary oedema.