J. Hahnel et al., DIFFERENT ENDOTRACHEAL-TUBES - CUFF SEAL, INTRATRACHEAL POSITION, ANDPOSTOPERATIVE THROAT COMPLAINTS, Anasthesist, 42(4), 1993, pp. 232-237
The study objective was to evaluate cuff seal, tube tip position and i
ncidence of postoperative sore throat in three different endotracheal
tubes: the reusable Rusch ''red rubber'' tube (low-volume, high-pressu
re cuff) and the disposable Rusch ''Super Safety Clear'' and Mallinckr
odt ''lo-pro'' tubes (both high-volume, low-pressure cuffs). Methods.
In a prospective randomized trial, 150 consecutive patients scheduled
for minor orthopaedic surgery under standardized general anaesthesia,
including standardized cuff pressure control, were allocated to one of
the three types of endotracheal tube. Leakage and intratracheal tube
tip position were investigated by means of fiberoptic tracheoscopy via
the endotracheal tube, preceded by pharyngeal instillation of indigoc
armine. The semi-standardized interviews for the recording of postoper
ative sore throat were performed once a day under double-blind conditi
ons from the day of operation to postoperative day 3. Statistical inde
pendence testing was based on the chi2-test, significance was assumed
at P < 0.05. Main results. A past-cuff leakage of the pharyngeally ins
tilled dye was found in three patients with '' red rubber'' tubes. In
all of these cases the tracheal cross section deviated markedly from c
ircular. The tips of the '' Super Safety Clear '' tubes tended to be b
etter centred (P=0.099). Bad tip position, however, had little influen
ce on postoperative throat complaints (P=0.394). The differences in in
cidence of postoperative throat complaints between the ''red rubber''
(48.9%), ''Super Safety Clear'' (35.6%) and ''lo-pro'' tubes (34.1%) d
id not reach the 5% level (P=0.288). Such complaints, however, were si
gnificantly more frequent in females and in obese patients who exceede
d their Broca weights by more than 25%. By contrast, postoperative thr
oat complaints did not vary statistically significantly by age group,
tracheal cross-sectional shape, use of atropine or duration of intubat
ion. Conclusion. Despite the economic (usable up to 100 times) and eco
logical (less PVC waste) advantages of the rubber tube, the disposable
tubes with high-volume, low-pressure cuffs tended to be superior rega
rding cuff seal, tube tip position and incidence of postoperative thro
at complaints. Nevertheless, the continued use of ''red rubber'' type
reusable tubes may be justified in cases where the tube has to stay in
place for only a short time.