Tm. Martin et al., PROPOFOL ANESTHESIA REDUCES EMESIS AND AIRWAY-OBSTRUCTION IN PEDIATRIC OUTPATIENTS, Anesthesia and analgesia, 76(1), 1993, pp. 144-148
This study was an authors' comparison of the effects of and recovery f
rom anesthesia in healthy, premedicated pediatric outpatients who rece
ived either inhaled anesthetics (group 1) or propofol (group 2). Group
1 (n = 68) averaged 3.8 +/- 0.2 yr and weighed 17.7 +/- 0.8 kg, where
as group 2 (n = 75) averaged 3.3 +/- 0.2 yr and weighed 16.3 +/- 0.6 k
g. The incidence of vomiting in the Postanesthetic Care Unit (PACU) an
d from discharge to the first postoperative morning was lower in the g
roup receiving propofol (0% and 18%) than in the group receiving volat
ile agents (7% and 34%, P < 0.05. The incidence of airway obstruction
during induction of anesthesia was higher (34% vs 10%, P < 0.01) in ch
ildren receiving inhaled agent. Withdrawal of the extremity with propo
fol injection occurred in 14 (19%) patients. Arterial blood pressure w
as higher at loss of consciousness, laryngoscopy, and tracheal intubat
ion in group 2 (P < 0.01). The length of time from the end of surgery
to extubation of the trachea, recovery scores, and length of time spen
t in the PACU and the Day Surgery Unit were the same in the two groups
. Pain scores obtained in the PACU were not different. The data indica
te that propofol can be used safely to induce and maintain anesthesia
in healthy pediatric outpatients. This coupled with the low incidence
of vomiting and airway obstruction in the propofol group suggests dist
inct and compelling reasons to consider using the drug in this patient
population.