American religious energies neither disappear nor flow through fixed c
hannels. What William James called ''the habitual centres of energy''
in an individual have cultural counterparts. In recent decades the cen
ters of energy have increasingly sought channels such as these: the pe
rsonal, private, and autonomous at the expense of the communal, the pu
blic, and the derivative; the accent on meaning at the expense of inhe
rited patterns of belonging; concentration on the local and particular
more than the cosmopolitan or ecumenical; concern for practical and a
ffective life accompanied by less devotion to the devotional and intel
lectual expressions; the feminist as opposed to the male dominated; an
d attention to separate causes more than to overarching civil commitme
nts. These contrasts are themselves neither absolute nor final; the le
ss stressed center of energy in each case survives but is not currentl
y prevailing or coming to prevail.