P. Chevret et al., MOLECULAR EVIDENCE THAT THE SPINY MOUSE (ACOMYS) IS MORE CLOSELY RELATED TO GERBILS (GERBILLINAE) THAN TO TRUE MICE (MURINAE), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United Statesof America, 90(8), 1993, pp. 3433-3436
Spiny mice of the genus Acomys traditionally have been classified as m
embers of the Murinae, a subfamily of rodents that also includes rats
and mice with which spiny mice share a complex set of morphological ch
aracters, including a unique molar pattern. The origin and evolution o
f this molar pattern, documented by many fossils from Southern Asia, s
upport the hypothesis of the monophyly of Acomys and all other Murinae
. This view has been challenged by immunological studies that have sug
gested that Acomys is as distantly related to mice (Mus) as are other
subfamilies (e.g., hamsters: Cricetinae) of the muroid rodents. We pre
sent molecular evidence derived from DNA-DNA hybridization data that i
ndicate that the spiny mouse Acomys and two African genera of Murinae,
Uranomys and Lophuromys, constitute a monophyletic clade, a view that
was recently suggested on the basis of dental characters. However, ou
r DNA.DNA hybridization data also indicate that the spiny mice (Acomys
) are more closely related to gerbils (Gerbillinae) than to the true m
ice and rats (Murinae) with which they have been classified. Because A
comys and the brush-furred mice Uranomys and Lophuromys share no deriv
ed morphological characters with the Gerbillinae, their murine morphol
ogy must have evolved by convergence, including the molar pattern prev
iously considered to support the monophyly of the Murinae.