ELECTRONIC EFFECTS OF PARA-SUBSTITUENTS AND META-SUBSTITUENTS ON THE EPR-D PARAMETER IN 1,3-ARYLCYCLOPENTANE-1,3-DIYL TRIPLET DIRADICALS - A NEW SPECTROSCOPIC MEASURE OF ALPHA-SPIN-DENSITIES AND RADICAL STABILIZATION ENERGIES IN BENZYL-TYPE MONORADICALS
W. Adam et al., ELECTRONIC EFFECTS OF PARA-SUBSTITUENTS AND META-SUBSTITUENTS ON THE EPR-D PARAMETER IN 1,3-ARYLCYCLOPENTANE-1,3-DIYL TRIPLET DIRADICALS - A NEW SPECTROSCOPIC MEASURE OF ALPHA-SPIN-DENSITIES AND RADICAL STABILIZATION ENERGIES IN BENZYL-TYPE MONORADICALS, Journal of organic chemistry, 62(5), 1997, pp. 1419-1426
The zero-field splitting D parameter was determined in a 2-MTHF glass
matrix at 77 K for a large set (35 derivatives) of para- and meta-subs
tituted 1,3-arylcyclopentane-1,3-diyl triplet diradicals 6. The D valu
es are a sensitive function of electronic substituent effects; for con
venience, the Delta D scale was defined as the difference D-H - D-X. S
pin accepters decrease while spin donors increase the D value relative
to the unsubstituted reference system (D-H) Theoretical (PM3-AUHF) al
pha spin densities (rho alpha) for the corresponding cumyl monoradical
s 7 display a good linear dependence (r(2) = 0.963) when plotted again
st the D parameters of the triplet diradicals 6. The radical stabiliza
tion energies (RSE) of the cumyl radicals 7 were semiempirically calcu
lated as the energy difference between in-plane (full conjugation) and
perpendicular (no conjugation) conformations of the aryl groups and s
hown to correlate linearly (r(2) = 0.947) against the experimental D p
arameter for the corresponding triplet diradicals 6. These linear corr
elations, i.e., D versus rho alpha and versus RSE, demonstrate that th
e D parameter of the localized triplet diradicals 6 reflects reliably
electronic substituent effects in benzyl-type monoradicals. The spectr
oscopic Delta D scale correlates poorly with the reported chemical sig
ma(rad) scales, unless polar corrections (Hammett sigma(pol) values) a
re made by means of a two-parameter Hammett treatment. Then a good lin
ear correlation (r(2) = 0.921) of the Delta D values versus the Creary
sigma(rad) scale applies; as expected, the radical effects dominate(r
ho(rad) = 1.00 versus rho(pol) = 0.41). The advantages of the new EPR-
spectroscopic Delta D scale are that polar effects are nominal and the
D parameter can be measured experimentally with sufficient accuracy t
o probe even small and subtle electronic effects through changes in th
e a spin densities.