Aim: To compare the vascular effects of lacidipine with those of other
calcium antagonists. Methods: A review of published studies. Results:
Experimental studies have shown that for a similar fall in blood pres
sure, lacidipine increased cardiac contractility while verapamil decre
ased cardiac contractility. In the rat aorta, the dose of lacidipine r
equired to reduce a calcium-induced contraction by 50% was lower than
that of all other calcium antagonists tested except nisoldipine. In hu
man studies, especially, there are inherent limitations in the techniq
ues available to measure regional blood flows under physiological cond
itions, making it difficult to compare the effects of different antihy
pertensive drugs. A recent study showed that renal blood flow was incr
eased by lacidipine without any reduction in renal function. As in ani
mals, vital organ perfusion was either preserved or increased. Further
, maximal coronary vasodilation was associated with lower coronary res
istance values during lacidipine treatment compared with pretreatment
values. Another lacidipine study showed increased brachial artery comp
liance, while a study on the radial artery showed that lacidipine incr
eased the compliance of this artery also. Conclusions: Lacidipine has
vascular selectivity. Although regional blood flows are difficult to m
easure, due to inherent limitations in the techniques available, the e
vidence suggests that lacidipine produces vasodilation in essential hy
pertensive subjects while maintaining or even increasing vital organ p
erfusion. This appears to be due to a regression of the structural cha
nges that characterize hypertension.