ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF PANCREATICADENOCARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY WITH COMPARISON TO ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND CT SCAN

Citation
L. Palazzo et al., ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF PANCREATICADENOCARCINOMA - RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY WITH COMPARISON TO ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND CT SCAN, Endoscopy, 25(2), 1993, pp. 143-150
Citations number
26
Journal title
ISSN journal
0013726X
Volume
25
Issue
2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
143 - 150
Database
ISI
SICI code
0013-726X(1993)25:2<143:EUITDA>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) was compared to ultrasonography (US) and CT scan (CT) in order to evaluate its role in the diagnosis and th e locoregional spread assessment of pancreatic cancer. Sixty-four pati ents suspected of pancreatic cancer were studied prospectively, and th e results of imaging techniques were compared to histology and surgica l exploration. There were 49 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 11 of pancreatitis, 2 of common bile duct carcinoma, 1 lymphoma and 1 hepat ocellular carcinoma with peripancreatic metastatic lymph nodes. EUS wa s significantly more accurate (91 %) than CT (66 %) and US (64 %) for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. EUS was able to image all 7 cancers le ss than 25 mm in diameter, US and CT only one. There were 4 false posi tives with EUS which were all cases of pseudotumorous pancreatitis. Fo r detecting lymph node involvement, EUS was significantly more sensiti ve (62 %) and accurate (74 %) than US (8 % and 37 %) and CT (19 % and 42 %), respectively. Invaded lymph nodes adjacent to large tumors and micrometastatic involvement were responsible for this lack of sensitiv ity. EUS was significantly more sensitive (100 %) than CT (71 %) and U S (17 %) for detecting venous involvement. The specificity of EUS was lower (67 %) because of duodenal bulb stenosis and large tumors. In co nclusion, this prospective and comparative study confirms that EUS is an accurate tool for diagnosis and locoregional spread assessment of p ancreatic cancer when performed in a reference center. EUS is of parti cular interest for small tumors. However, EUS does not enable differen tiation of pseudotumorous pancreatitis from adenocarcinoma.