M. Idnurm et Ca. Heinrich, A PALEOMAGNETIC STUDY OF HYDROTHERMAL ACTIVITY AND URANIUM MINERALIZATION AT MT PAINTER, SOUTH-AUSTRALIA, Australian journal of earth sciences, 40(1), 1993, pp. 87-101
Palaeomagnetic measurements indicate that the uraniferous Radium Ridge
Breccias near Mt Painter in the northern Flinders Ranges of South Aus
tralia have been magnetized twice, both times in the Permo-Carbonifero
us. The palaeomagnetic south pole for one remanence was estimated as 1
65.1-degrees-E, 65.7-degrees-S (A95 = 11.5-degrees). The direction for
the other remanence was not well defined; however samples collected f
rom diamictite bodies within the breccia gave 133.9-degrees-E, 33.1-de
grees-S (A95 = 6.9-degrees) as the probable pole for the overprint. Th
e latter is similar to overprint poles published from central Australi
a, which are generally attributed to the Alice Springs Orogeny. Magnet
ization directions interpreted as Permo-Carboniferous were obtained al
so from the Mt Gee Sinter (a quartz-hematite-rich chemical sedimentary
rock which overlies the Radium Ridge Breccias) and from U-mineralized
hematitic ironstone bodies within the breccia. The magnetizations of
both units were probably coeval with the younger magnetization of the
Radium Ridge Breccias. A positive fold test demonstrates that the rema
nence of the sinter is primary, indicating a major hydrothermal event
in the Permo-Carboniferous. It is not clear by how much this event pos
t-dates the deposition of the underlying Radium Ridge Breccias and hem
atitic ironstone. The latter may be Ordovician or older if earlier mon
azite U-Pb data are correct, and may have been formed by granite-relat
ed hydrothermal fluids. In that case. the older remanence in the brecc
ia is also an overprint. Epithermal sinter formation and chemical (rat
her than purely thermal) resetting of the remanence in the underlying
breccia were probably due to deep circulation of oxidized fluids durin
g Permo-Carboniferous tectonic activity. Chemical reaction of these fl
uids with pre-existing magnetite-bearing ironstone may have been respo
nsible for uranium mineralization during the Permo-Carboniferous. This
interpretation is consistent with published textural, isotopic and fl
uid inclusion data, but an older age for the uranium concentration, as
a primary part of the ironstone formation, cannot be excluded. Altern
atively, if the monazite data are discarded, the entire hydrothermal p
rocess including iron, uranium and silica deposition could have occurr
ed in the Permo-Carboniferous.