W. Skrandies, MONOCULAR AND BINOCULAR NEURONAL-ACTIVITY IN HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX REVEALED BY ELECTRICAL BRAIN ACTIVITY MAPPING, Experimental Brain Research, 93(3), 1993, pp. 516-520
In the present study, we investigated topographical differences betwee
n monocularly and binocularly evoked potential fields related to the r
etinal location and spatial frequency of grating stimuli. Electrical b
rain activity was recorded in 18 healthy adults using an array of 21 e
lectrodes over the occipital areas. Vertical black-and-white grating p
atterns of different spatial frequencies were presented with central f
ixation or lateralized to the left or right hemiretina. Computation of
global field power determined component latency. Topographic characte
ristics of the field distributions were examined at the individual com
ponent latency for each subject using statistical comparisons between
experimental conditions. The strength of the potential fields was sign
ificantly larger with binocular stimuli, whereas no effects were obser
ved when comparing component latencies. Pronounced differences occurre
d in the spatial distribution of electrical brain activity: with 2.5 c
ycles/deg, large, significant topographic differences between monocula
rly and binocularly evoked activity were obtained. The potential field
s showed a more anterior and more lateralized component distribution w
ith binocular than monocular stimuli. In addition, when the gratings w
ere presented binocularly, significant topographic differences were ob
served when low and high spatial frequency stimuli were compared. Our
results suggest that the relationship between the topography of evoked
components and retinal stimulus location and spatial frequency is dif
ferent for monocular and binocular stimuli, indicating that binocular
information processing triggers different neuronal processes in the hu
man visual cortex.