J. Bonneton et al., STEADY-STATE PHARMACOKINETICS OF CONVENTIONAL VERSUS CONTROLLED-RELEASE CARBAMAZEPINE IN PATIENTS WITH EPILEPSY, Epilepsy research, 14(3), 1993, pp. 257-263
The purpose of the present study was to compare the pharmacokinetic pa
rameters of two carbamazepine (CBZ) tablet formulations (conventional
(CBZ-CO) and controlled-release (CBZ-CR)) in patients with epilepsy re
ceiving the drug as monotherapy or polytherapy. The absorption rate co
nstant (K(a)), steady-state volume of distribution (V(dss)) and total
clearance (CL) were computed with the APIS software using 31 blood lev
el profiles from 23 patients who were divided into four groups: patien
ts receiving CBZ-CO in polytherapy, the same patients switched to CBZ-
CR in the same polytherapy conditions, patients receiving CBZ-CO in mo
notherapy and patients receiving CBZ-CR in monotherapy. The four group
s were compared in order to assess the significance of differences in
K(a), V(dss), CL and diurnal fluctuations of plasma CBZ concentration.
The results show a significant decrease of the K(a) in the CBZ-CR gro
ups compared to the CBZ-CO groups, both on monotherapy and on polyther
apy. The comparison between the monotherapy and polytherapy groups sho
ws increases of V(dss) and CL, both in CBZ-CO and CBZ-CR polytherapy g
roups. Dispersion of pharmacokinetic data was higher in patients on CB
Z-CO; among patients on CBZ-CR, dispersion was lowest in the monothera
py group. Clinical improvement was found in four of eight patients swi
tched from CBZ-CO to CBZ-CR. CBZ-CR is therefore a valuable alternativ
e to CBZ-CO.