Interpretations of figurative language expressions were compared in ma
tched samples of 28 language/learning-disabled (LLD) and 28 academical
ly achieving (non-LLD) adolescents. LLD adolescents performed signific
antly poorer than their non-LLD age peers. All but 1 of 12 figurative
language expressions contributed to the significant group difference.
Stepwise discriminant analysis identified 3 figurative expressions as
the best single predictors of an LLD group placement. Qualitative anal
ysis indicated that the LLD group produced predominantly literal error
interpretations while the non-LLD controls produced predominantly par
tial and/or incomplete error interpretations. The results indicate tha
t interpretation and matching of figurative language expressions can a
ssess levels of acquisition of metaphoric ability by adolescents and p
rovide suggestions for intervention.