The goodnesses of fit over the entire life span of four models of mort
ality are compared using life tables from Australia and the United Sta
tes. The results indicate that the five-parameter Siler model fits con
siderably better than the more complex eight-parameter Heligman-Pollar
d and Mode-Busby models. On the other hand, the ten-parameter model pr
oposed by Mode and Jacobson fits human mortality patterns better than
the Siler model. We conclude that the Heligman-Pollard and Mode-Busby
models are probably misspecified. Additional research is necessary to
determine (1) whether the Heligman-Pollard model can be improved by sp
ecifying it as a true hazard model and (2) whether the respecified Hel
igman-Pollard and Mode-Jacobson models are statistically robust, parti
cularly with abridged life tables.