Ds. Freestone et H. Mitchell, INAPPROPRIATE PUBLICATION OF TRIAL RESULTS AND POTENTIAL FOR ALLEGATIONS OF ILLEGAL SHARE DEALING, BMJ. British medical journal, 306(6885), 1993, pp. 1112-1114
There is increasing evidence of fraud in clinical research, and one as
pect concerns trading in pharmaceutical company shares by people who m
ay have confidential information about the results of clinical trials.
Plainly this has implications for honest investigators, who may find
themselves exposed to such allegations. In this paper Dr D S Freestone
and Mr H Mitchell, QC, identify three interlinked issues which they t
hink underlie the potential for these allegations. They are pressure f
or premature or inappropriate communication of research results; tradi
ng in pharmaceutical company shares by academic clinical investigators
; and the possibility that clinical investigators might succumb to tem
ptation. Dr Freestone and Mr Mitchell suggest that whenever possible r
esults of clinical studies should be published in appropriate medical
journals without prior public disclosure. This conflicts with Stock Ex
change rules, which require that price sensitive information should be
published at the earliest opportunity and preclude priority of public
ation in medical journals. Freestone and Mitchell believe that rarely
rapid public disclosure is acceptable if it is to protect patients' in
terests but that it must not prejudice publication in the medical or s
cientific press. When rapid public disclosure is needed, they say, eve
ry attempt should be made to inform prescribers before patients. Dr Fr
eestone and Mr Mitchell warn that academic clinical investigators who
have access to unpublished price sensitive information about pharmaceu
tical companies whose shares they trade in will almost certainly be in
breach of the Company Securities (Insider Dealing) Act 1985. Furtherm
ore, disclosing such information to third parties, they say, exposes t
hose people also to potential criminal liability. Freestone and Mitche
ll advise that when potential for allegations of conflict of interest
exists clinical investigators should consider declaring their position
to ethics committees and any sponsoring organisations.