Cm. Cho et Sw. Lee, ON THE ASSUMED STRAIN FORMULATION FOR GEOMETRICALLY NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS, Finite elements in analysis and design, 24(1), 1996, pp. 31-47
Assumed strain formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis is ree
xamined with particular attention to recovery of incremental strain an
d compatibility mismatch. Two approaches considered for strain recover
y lead to alternate expressions. for compatibility mismatch but the sa
me incremental load vector due to equilibrium imbalance and compatibil
ity mismatch. However, they result in the differences in the stiffness
matrix due to initial stress. Numerical tests conducted on example pr
oblems demonstrate that the conventional approach with linearized comp
atibility condition is superior to the alternate approach when increme
nts in loads or displacements are large. In addition, the results of n
umerical tests conducted on a geometrically linear problem point out t
hat an assumed strain field that suppresses incompatible spurious kine
matic mode could reintroduce element locking, suggesting that it shoul
d be undesirable to suppress incompatible modes at element level.