Objectives: In the Netherlands, dental implants have been included in
the National Dental Insurance Scheme (NDIS) since 1989. Nowadays, out-
of-pocket expenditure is low, making implant treatment financially fea
sible for a large group of edentulous, potential implant candidates. T
reatment can be performed by both oral surgeons and general dentists.
Results of implant treatment in the literature are usually obtained in
academic and specialized centers. In contrast to this, the present st
udy evaluates the quantitative and qualitative aspects of rehabilitati
on with oral implants in combination with an overdenture when applied
on a nationwide scale. Methods: For this purpose all patients (n=5410)
treated between January 1989 and July 1992 were extensively documente
d pre-operatively, implant patients (n=429) were clinically investigat
ed by two independent observers and the effect of treatment on denture
complaints was assessed by means of a questionnaire (n=460). Results:
Only a small proportion of the potential pool of implant candidates i
s actually being treated, to a constant number of approximately 2000 p
atients a year. The selected patients have major denture problems and
have received relatively high levels of prosthetic care during the las
t decade. Clinical results are comparable to those reported in the lit
erature, implant survival after 3 years for the lower jaw being 96.3%
and for the upper jaw 70.4%. Oral hygiene was frequently considered su
boptimal and seen in conjunction with marginal inflammation of the per
i-implant mucosa. Subjective results were excellent, patients were qui
te satisfied with the improvements in the comfort and esthetics of the
ir lower denture. Conclusions: Implant-overdenture treatment, within t
he guidelines and regulations set by the Dutch NDIS, is a safe and eff
ective treatment alternative, in particular for the rehabilitation of
the lower jaw. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.