COMPARISON OF 2 SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETERMINING FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS IN WORKPLACE AIR

Citation
D. Kuchenbecker et al., COMPARISON OF 2 SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETERMINING FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS IN WORKPLACE AIR, Staub, Reihhaltung der Luft, 53(4), 1993, pp. 143-145
Citations number
3
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Engineering, Civil
Journal title
ISSN journal
00390771
Volume
53
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
143 - 145
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-0771(1993)53:4<143:CO2SMF>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Two sampling methods for formaldehyde were tested simultaneously under laboratory and workplace conditions in the institute for pathology of the University Leipzig. The first method (DFG-method) makes use of a silicagel tube to collect formaldehyde from the air. The second method (TGL-standard) consists in separating the water-soluble formaldehyde from the contaminated air. On account of the fact that the degree of d esorption of formaldehyde from silicagel is 0.96, it can be stated tha t the formaldehyde concentrations determined by means of the two sampl ing methods are equivalent. The analysis of formaldehyde adsorbed on s ilicagel is more time consuming. However, tubes containing solid adsor bents should be used for personal sampling at workplaces where employe es have to move a lot.