A recent dispute over the ownership of original material in a commerci
al music recording was settled as a direct result of a comparative aco
ustic analysis specially formulated to deal with the demands of the ca
se. The dispute centred on whether a given piece of popular music was
a re-recording by a session musician of the original score, or a re-mi
x from an original recording. Direct comparisons based on the waveform
s and/or spectra were not possible since the new recording included ot
her instruments in its mix. This paper describes the application of a
novel acoustic methodology leading to results which suggested that the
new recording was in fact a re-mix of the original recording and not
a copy performance by a session musician.