A. Schnuch et al., THE STANDARD SERIES IN THE EPICUTANEOUS PATCH TEST - 1ST RESULTS OF THE PROJECT INFORMATION NETWORK OF DERMATOLOGICAL CLINICS (IVDK), Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt, 41(2), 1993, pp. 60-70
Presented are the patch test results of 4140 patients from eight skin
hospitals, which were gathered during the pilot phase of the multicent
er project ''Information Network of Dermatological Clinics'' (IVDK). A
sensitization was found in 47% of the people tested. This proportion
varies between 30 and 64% from clinic to clinic. Two factors can be co
nsidered as the main cause for the great deviations in test results: t
he indication for testing which differs from hospital to hospital and
a difference in the clinics' rating of reactions (''inter-observer var
iability'') which is revealed in this study. Even if the hit list does
not differ from other studies with regard to its qualitative composit
ion, the multivariate analysis - taking into consideration characteris
tics such as age, sex, occupation, neurodermitis, and location of the
eczemas - shows considerable quantitative shifts among the sensitizati
on frequencies in the case of certain subgroups. So, eg., the importan
ce of sensitizations against nickel becomes apparent only after paying
regard to age and sex: no less than 41% of the tested women under 30
had a sensitization against nickel - compared to a sensitization frequ
ency against nickel of 16.9% in the final hit list. Elder patients, ev
en without leg dermatitis, run a considerably higher risk of being sen
sitized against externa-associated allergens, eg with a risk factor of
9.9 for neomycin. If additionally, the patient suffers from leg derma
titis, the risk increases - in the case of neomycin to 19.9. Since the
standard series does not contain any individual or epidemiologic char
acteristics, it is limited in its individual diagnostic sensitivity as
well as in its epidemiologic relevance. Therefore, eg, 20%, of the po
sitive reactions resulted exclusively from additional tests; the hit l
ists, the numerical-statistical correlate of the standard series lacks
above all a satisfying definition of the epidemiologic reference, the
''denominator'' (x positive cases per defined population unit). Moreo
ver, there are considerable fluctuations among the ''numerator quantit
ies'', which are due to the distinct observer variability. In spite of
this, however, the standard series as well as the hit list maintain t
heir value for individual diagnostics and the general frequency balanc
ing of the most important allergens.