BIORESONANCE ALLERGY TEST VERSUS PRICK TESTING AND RAST

In 6 patients allergens were assessed by case history, prick testing a nd RAST. Two sere duplicates of each of these 6 patients were assessed by alternative bioresonance method (Mora) in a double blind fashion. 47 allergens were investigated, results were compared. The bioresonanc e method obtained the same results in 5 (negative results) out of 47 c ases in duplicate as assessed by prick testing and RAST. Six times bio resonance method revealed contradictory results in the duplicate sera. By summarising 6 sera in duplicate the bioresonance method gave the s ame results in 20 out of 94 allergens (4 positive reactions, 16 negati ve reactions) as assessed by prick testing and RAST. In addition the b ioresonance method diagnosed 110 allergens not diagnosed by prick test ing nor by RAST but only 4/110 allergens were diagnosed twice in the d uplicate sera. Bioresonance method does not show reproduceable results and is not capable of diagnosing allergies.