K. Wrenn et al., THE USE OF STRUCTURED, COMPLAINT-SPECIFIC PATIENT ENCOUNTER FORMS IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT, Annals of emergency medicine, 22(5), 1993, pp. 805-812
Study objective: To assess the effect of preprinted, structured, compl
aint-specific patient encounter forms on documentation, use of testing
, and treatment compared with free-text record keeping. Design: Nonran
domized case-control trial. Setting: University-affiliated, tertiary r
eferral hospital emergency department. Methods: The records of all pat
ients with lacerations, pharyngitis, asthma, or isolated closed-head i
njury during an eight-month period were reviewed. Intervention: Use of
structured complaint-specific patient encounter forms versus traditio
nal free-text record keeping. Main outcome measure: The null hypothesi
s was that there would be no differences in documentation, test use, o
r practice when the structured forms were used compared with free-text
record keeping. Results: Differences in documentation that favored th
e use of the structured forms for all four problems studied were seen
consistently. Not only was documentation improved, but test use also w
as affected in a way that decreased use. In addition, in certain areas
(eg, treatment of pharyngitis), clinical practice also was changed. C
onclusion: Structured, problem-specific ED records improve documentati
on and affect both resource use and clinical practice. These forms may
be useful for improving communication and reimbursement as well as fo
r medicolegal documentation. They provide a method for standardized qu
ality assurance review and clinical data abstraction. Finally, they pr
ovide a method for active dissemination of clinical standards.