A. Hoegholm et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR MASS AND GEOMETRY IN PATIENTS WITH ESTABLISHED HYPERTENSION AND WHITE COAT HYPERTENSION, American journal of hypertension, 6(4), 1993, pp. 282-286
This study was designed to compare the cardiac mass and geometry in wh
ite coat hypertensive patients and established hypertensive patients t
hrough the prospective comparison of office blood pressure, daytime am
bulatory blood pressure, and echocardiographically determined left ven
tricular mass and cardiac geometry in consecutive patients. We studied
143 patients from general practice in an outpatient hypertension unit
. The patients had newly diagnosed mild-to-moderate hypertension prior
to the institution of pharmacological antihypertensive therapy. All p
atients had a diastolic office blood pressure above 90 mm Hg; 90 had a
consistently elevated diastolic blood pressure (established hypertens
ion), whereas 53 had an average daytime ambulatory blood pressure belo
w 90 mm Hg (white coat hypertension). Left ventricular mass index was
significantly higher in the group with established hypertension, 102.4
+/- 26.6 g/m2 (mean +/- SD) v 93.6 +/- 23.5 (P = .045). Relative wall
thickness was likewise significantly higher, 0.36 +/-0.07 v 0.33 +/-
0.06 (P = .004). There was no significant difference in left atrial di
mension, In a multiple regression model the ambulatory measurements an
d not the office measurements were statistically significantly associa
ted with the extent of cardiac hypertrophy. Further, 44/53 (83%) of th
e patients with white coat hypertension had normal left ventricular di
mensions, versus only 55/90 (61%) of the patients with established hyp
ertension (P = .033). Thus, white coat hypertensive patients display l
ess cardiac involvement than patients with established hypertension, i
ndicating that they should rather be treated as normotensives than as
hypertensives, ie, not with pharmacological antihypertensive therapy.