Lead/acid batteries are by far the largest use of lead and they contin
ue to grow in importance, both as a proportion of total lead use and i
n actual tonnage terms. They are also well suited to recycling and rep
resent the major source of recoverable lead. As such, they are collect
ed and recycled in large numbers in most countries. Unfortunately, the
economics of recycling are not always favourable and recycling rates
are therefore prone to fluctuation, tending to fall at times of low le
ad price and rise when prices are firmer. On top of this, tightening e
nvironmental standards are imposing additional costs on those involved
in battery collection and recovery and are discouraging some traditio
nal participants from continuing involvement in the process. As a resu
lt, considerable attention is being paid to ways of ensuring consisten
tly high rates of battery recovery. Various approaches have been consi
dered, both voluntary and compulsory, and several have been put into p
ractice. Two main collection routes are used: the battery distribution
network and the scrap-metal trade. A range of different measures are
employed including acceptance of scrap batteries by retailers, compuls
ory exchange of old batteries for new, prohibitions on disposal of scr
ap batteries with household waste, returnable deposits on battery sale
s, and environmental levies. In all cases, the schemes are backed by e
ducation campaigns to ensure their effectiveness. The paper examines t
he principles behind the various approaches and describes several of t
he schemes that have been piloted or introduced in different countries
.