Op. Rosaeg et al., THE OBSTETRICAL-ANESTHESIA ASSESSMENT CLINIC - A REVIEW OF 6 YEARS EXPERIENCE, Canadian journal of anaesthesia, 40(4), 1993, pp. 346-356
We reviewed the out-patient consultation notes of 136 pregnant women s
een at the Ottawa Civic Hospital from 1985 to 1991 to evaluate the eff
iciacy of an Obstetric Anaesthesia Assessment Clinic (OAC). In additio
n, their anaesthetic records from labour and delivery were reviewed. F
or each patient the reason for referral was recorded according to the
involved organ system. The anaesthetic management at delivery was comp
ared with the proposed anaesthetic plan by the OAC consultant (obstetr
ic anaesthetist). The majority of women 84 (62%) had complaints relate
d to the musculo-skeletal system. In addition, 18 patients were referr
ed because of previous anaesthetic problems, ten with a history of car
diac disease, and eight with neurological disease. Lumbar epidural ana
lgesia (LEA) was a safe and effective choice for parturients with low
back pain, history of lumbar fractures or single level discectomies wi
thout lumbar fusion. Parturients with posterior instrumentation experi
enced an increased incidence of inadequate pain relief from LEA. Indiv
idualized anaesthetic management plans were executed for parturients w
ith spina bifida occulta, neurological, cardiac, and haematological di
sease as well as for women with a history of adverse drug reactions an
d previous problems with regional or general anaesthesia. It is conclu
ded that the OAC has provided a valuable service to obstetricians and
anaesthetists for the anaesthetic management of pregnant women with co
existing disease. The OAC gave an opportunity for patient education re
garding anaesthetic options for labour and delivery. The attending ana
esthetist was provided with a risk assessment and anaesthetic manageme
nt plan which was adhered to with only two exceptions. Finally, the ob
stetrician was given consistent advice regarding anaesthesia managemen
t that may affect obstetrical decisions.