The abrasive wear behaviour of three white cast irons, designated as 1
0Cr-3.5Ni, 15Cr-3Mo and 16.5Cr-1.5Mo irons (where the compositions are
in weight per cent), was studied in a field test as liners installed
in a transfer of an iron ore operation and in three laboratory wear te
sts (pin-on-drum, dry-sand-rubber-wheel (DSRW) and paddle testers) to
determine the relevance of the laboratory wear tests to the field line
r test. The results from the wear tests and wear mechanism study showe
d that under the test conditions the DSRW test most closely predicts t
he relative wear rate of the white irons in the field liner test. Howe
ver, a perfect match of both the wear mechanism and the rank of the we
ar rate for the iron from the laboratory wear test to the field liner
test was not achieved, owing to the complexity of the field liner wear
condition. The wear mechanisms were elucidated by microscopic examina
tion of the worn surfaces for both field-tested liners and laboratory-
tested specimens, and by subsurface examination of paddle-tested speci
mens, together with the microstructural study of the irons. The predom
inant wear mechanisms depend upon both the wear conditions and the mic
rostructural properties of the irons. It was found that the wear resis
tance of the White irons for the low stress abrasion is controlled by
the matrix, and that for the high stress abrasion and impact abrasion
is main determined by the bulk hardness of the irons.